Which of the following would NOT be considered a potential consequence of poor manual handling for an employee?

The selection indicating that increased sick pay costs would not be considered a potential consequence of poor manual handling is based on the understanding that poor handling techniques can lead to various adverse effects on employees' health and well-being. However, in a broader context, increased sick pay costs are often a direct result of the other consequences associated with poor manual handling practices.

When employees suffer from injuries related to musculoskeletal disorders, their capability to work effectively is compromised, which can lead to a need for time off for recovery. This time off inevitably translates into increased costs for the employer, specifically in terms of sick pay expenses. Moreover, the implications of poor manual handling practices extend beyond just immediate physical injuries; they can also encompass mental and emotional strains, which may further contribute to absenteeism.

In contrast, musculoskeletal disorders, decreased work efficiency, and increased fatigue and stress reflect common and direct results of improper manual handling techniques. These factors not only impact the employee's health but also influence the overall productivity and operational dynamics within the workplace. Therefore, while sick pay costs arise as a consequence, they are more a reflection of the cumulative effects of the other highlighted issues rather than a direct consequence of poor manual handling practices themselves.